Evaluation of additional resources used in therapist-assisted transdiagnostic internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) programs, beyond standardized core ICBT lessons, brief additional resources are sometimes available to clients to address comorbid concerns or offer additional information/strategies. These resources remain understudied in terms of how they are selected and perceived by clients, as well as their relationship to satisfaction and outcomes. Among clients ( N = 793) enrolled in a 5-lesson transdiagnostic ICBT course, we examined client use and perceptions of 18 additional resources at 8 weeks in terms of whether clients found resources informative (yes/no) and or helpful (yes/no). Resources elaborated on cognitive strategies (managing beliefs, risk calculation) or on managing specific problems (agricultural stress, alcohol misuse, anger, assertiveness, chronic conditions, communication, grief, health anxiety, motivation, pain, panic, postpartum depression/anxiety, PTSD, sleep, workplace accomodations, worry). Clients also completed symptom measures and ICBT satisfaction questions at 8 weeks. Approximately 50 % ( n = 398) of clients rated the resources and, on average, clients reported that 3.35 (SD = 3.34) resources were informative and 2.35 (SD = 2.52) resources were helpful as measured by direct questions developed for this study. Higher pre-treatment PTSD and GAD scores were related to a greater number of resources perceived as informative and or helpful. Rating more resources as informative and or helpful had a weak but positive association with ICBT satisfaction and depression, anxiety, PTSD and insomnia change scores. Limitations of the study include that 31 % ( n = 245) did not respond to questions about use of resources and 18.9 % ( n = 150) said they did not review resources. There is considerable use of diverse additional resources in ICBT in routine care. Associations suggest that clients are using resources to personalize treatment to their needs and these resources are associated with treatment satisfaction and outcomes. The correlational associations between symptoms and perceived helpfulness of resources can help inform personalization algorithms to optimize ICBT delivery for clients. Further research on how to match clients with, encourage use of, and maximize benefits of resources would be beneficial. • Brief additiogepnal resources can help to personalize ICBT. • Resources on worry, beliefs, and sleep were downloaded most often. • Positive resource ratings were associated with ICBT satisfaction. • Positive resource ratings were associated with symptom change scores.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,080 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle