Demystifying Mental Health by Decoding Facial Action Unit Sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mental health is indispensable for effective daily functioning and stress management. Facial expressions may provide vital clues about the mental state of a person as they are universally consistent across cultures. This study intends to detect the emotional variances through facial micro-expressions using facial action units (AUs) to identify probable mental health issues. In addition, convolutional neural networks (CNN) were used to detect and classify the micro-expressions. Further, combinations of AUs were identified for the segmentation of micro-expressions classes using K-means square. Two benchmarked datasets CASME II and SAMM were employed for the training and evaluation of the model. The model achieved an accuracy of 95.62% on CASME II and 93.21% on the SAMM dataset, respectively. Subsequently, a case analysis was done to identify depressive patients using the proposed framework and it attained an accuracy of 92.99%. This experiment revealed the fact that emotions like disgust, sadness, anger, and surprise are the prominent emotions experienced by depressive patients during communication. The findings suggest that leveraging facial action units for micro-expression detection offers a promising approach to mental health diagnostics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".