Expériences du quotidien et de l’ordinaire dans La Vie ordinaire d’Adèle Van Reeth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans son premier récit autobiographique, La Vie ordinaire (2020), Adèle Van Reeth développe une réflexion sur les expériences de la vie ordinaire (vivre en ville, déménager, devenir mère, écrire un livre) au croisement de l’écriture du quotidien et du discours essayistique. Dans ce texte hybride, le dédoublement de la voix narrative entre le présent évoquant des actes et gestes concrets du jour le jour et des rappels indirects d’un passé où la narratrice étudie la philosophie de la vie ordinaire (Stanley Cavell) à l’Université de Chicago, déploie les tensions entre la perception et l’intellectualisation du quotidien. Ayant recours aux distinctions que fait Bruce Bégout entre les notions de « quotidien » et d’« ordinaire » (2005), nous montrons que Van Reeth s’interroge sur les frontières entre l’expérimentation sensible (l’attention aux détails) et la théorisation du quotidien, approche qu’il paraît profitable d’explorer pour souligner que les croisements entre littérature et philosophie élargissent notre compréhension de l’écriture du quotidien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".