MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400513966 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1418359

Time to take HPV infection in colorectal cancer patients more seriously

2024· article· en· W4400513966 on OpenAlexaff
Mahsa Javadi, Shahram Jalilian, Malek Kanani, Vahid Kia, Abdolhassan Talaiezadeh, Kambiz Ahmadi Angali, Mohammad Karimi Baba Ahmadi, Manoochehr Makvandi

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsColorectal cancerMedicineOncologyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The association between viral infections and colorectal cancer (CRC) remains an enigma in cancer research. Certain types of Human Papillomaviruses (hr-HPVs), known for their oncogenic properties, have been observed in particular CRC biopsies, further adding to the enigma surrounding this association. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study was conducted on 40 confirmed cases of CRC adenocarcinoma. The presence and genotyping of HPV DNA in colorectal fresh tissue and urine samples was assessed using an HPV DNA hybridization kit. A subset of serum samples from both CRC cases and healthy volunteers was randomly chosen and subjected to western blot to investigate the presence of HPV16 E6/E7 oncoproteins carried by exosomes. Results It was observed that 26/40 HPV-positive CRC patients demonstrated 7 times more chance to develop colorectal cancer when compared to those 8/40 normal tissue (odds ratio [OR] = 7.4; confidence interval [CI] 95% = 0.483156–0.793718; p < 0.001). Of 26 HPV-positive CRC patients, 14 urine samples were also showed HPV DNA positivity (p = 0.013). High-risk HPV16 was the most prevalent genotype detected in both 24/40 tumor and 12/40 urine samples (p < 0.001). The tumor sample of a male was HPV45, while another male’s urine sample was HPV31. A female CRC patient had HPV83 in tumor and HPV56 in urine. Here, was the first detection of HPV83 in a CRC patient. Notably among 20 randomly selected serum exosome samples, one serum sample concurrently tested positive for both HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins, and one sample tested positive for HPV16 E7 oncoprotein. Conclusion High risk HPV DNA detection in CRC urine samples supports non-invasive screening tools. Detection of HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins in exosomes from serum samples shows potential for non-invasive diagnostics. HPV’s potential role in CRC development is also underscored. HPV vaccination should be implemented in low- and middle-income countries to prevent cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207