Efectos en el VO2 MAX al entrenar resistencia en luchadores antioqueños durante el período competitivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La lucha como deporte posee una tradición histórica importante al punto que siempre ha hecho parte del programa Olímpico, su competencia se divide en categorías por peso corporal y en dos estilos: Libre y grecorromana. Durante los últimos 20 años la Federación Internacional de Luchas Asociadas (FILA), ha hecho modificaciones al reglamento, variando asuntos técnicos pero que mantienen la resistencia como una componente determinante, partiendo que valorar el VO2Max., da un indicativo significativo de la resistencia. El aporte del presente estudio a pesar de las limitaciones que tiene con el reducido número de participantes, es aportar elementos para valorar la importancia de optimizar niveles de VO2Máx. durante el período competitivo en atletas de nivel nacional, y brindar información sobre cuál método es más pertinente para tal logro: Intermitente o interválico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".