MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400518961 · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5a6f

A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715

2024· preprint· en· W4400518961 on OpenAlexaff
Devarshi Choudhury, Tuomo Salmi, S. Vinciguerra, Thomas E. Riley, Yves Kini, Anna L. Watts, Bas Dorsman, Slavko Bogdanov, Sébastien Guillot, Paul S. Ray, Daniel J. Reardon, Ronald A. Remillard, A. V. Bilous, Daniela Huppenkothen, James M. Lattimer, Nathan Rutherford, Zaven Arzoumanian, Keith C. Gendreau, Sharon M. Morsink, Wynn C. G. Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsNeutron starMillisecond pulsarAstrophysicsPulsarRADIUSAstronomyBinary pulsarMagnetarLight curve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report Bayesian inference of the mass, radius, and hot X-ray emitting region properties—using data from the Neutron Star Interior Composition ExploreR (NICER)—for the brightest rotation-powered millisecond X-ray pulsar, PSR J0437−4715. Our modeling is conditional on informative tight priors on mass, distance, and binary inclination obtained from radio pulsar timing using the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA; Reardon et al.), and we use NICER background models to constrain the nonsource background, cross-checking with data from XMM-Newton. We assume two distinct hot emitting regions and various parameterized hot region geometries that are defined in terms of overlapping circles; while simplified, these capture many of the possibilities suggested by detailed modeling of return current heating. For the preferred model identified by our analysis, we infer a mass of M = 1.418 ± 0.037 M ⊙ (largely informed by the PPTA mass prior) and an equatorial radius of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>11.36</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.63</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.95</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> km, each reported as the posterior credible interval bounded by the 16% and 84% quantiles. This radius favors softer dense matter equations of state and is highly consistent with constraints derived from gravitational wave measurements of neutron star binary mergers. The hot regions are inferred to be nonantipodal and hence inconsistent with a pure centered dipole magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations238
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal LettersSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207