Numerical Simulations of Scalar Transport on Rough Surfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Numerical simulations provide unfettered access to details of the flow where experimental measurements are difficult to obtain. This paper summarises the progress achieved in the study of passive scalars in flows over rough surfaces thanks to recent numerical simulations. Townsend’s similarity applies to various scalar statistics, implying the differences due to roughness are limited to the roughness sublayer (RSL). The scalar field exhibits a diffusive sublayer that increasingly conforms to the roughness surface as ks+ or Pr increase. The scalar wall flux is enhanced on the windward slopes of the roughness, where the analogy between momentum and scalar holds well; the momentum and scalar fields, however, have very different behaviours downwind of the roughness elements, due to recirculation, which reduces the scalar wall flux. Roughness causes breakdown of the Reynolds analogy: any increase in St is accompanied by a larger increase in cf. A flattening trend for the scalar roughness function, ΔΘ+, is observed as ks+ increases, suggesting the possibility of a scalar fully rough regime, different from the velocity one. The form-induced (FI) production of scalar fluctuations becomes dominant inside the RSL and is significantly different from the FI production of turbulent kinetic energy, resulting in notable differences between the scalar and velocity fluctuations. Several key questions remain open, in particular regarding the existence of a fully rough scalar regime and its characteristics. With the increase in Re and Pr, various quantities such as scalar roughness function, the dispersive fluxes, FI wall flux, etc., appear to trend towards saturation. However, the limited range of Re and Pr achieved by numerical simulations only allows us to speculate regarding such asymptotic behaviour. Beyond extending the range of Re and Pr, systematic coverage of different roughness types and topologies is needed, as the scalar appears to remain sensitive to the geometrical details.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it