Structural and Functional Fidelity of Virtual Humans in Immersive Virtual Learning Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central to many immersive virtual learning environments (iVLEs) are virtual humans, or characters that are digital representations, which can serve as virtual instructors to facilitate learning. Current technology is allowing the production of photo-realistic (high fidelity/highly realistic) avatars, whether using traditional approaches relying on 3D modeling, or modern tools leveraging generative AI and virtual character creation tools. However, fidelity (i.e., level of realism) is complex as it can be analyzed from various points of view referring to its structure, function, interactivity, and behavior among others. Given its relevance, fidelity can influence various aspects of iVLEs including engagement and ultimately learning outcomes. In this work-in-progress paper, we propose a study that will examine the effect of structural and functional fidelity of a virtual human assistant on engagement within a virtual simulation designed to teach the cognitive aspects (e.g., the steps of a procedure) of the heart auscultation procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".