MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Data-Driven Model for Improving MEG Epileptic Spike Detection

2024· article· en· W4400526681 on OpenAlexaff
Antora Dev, Mostafa M. Fouda, Zubair Md. Fadlullah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpike (software development)Computer scienceMagnetoencephalographyData modelingEpilepsyArtificial intelligenceElectroencephalographyNeuroscienceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by spontaneous recurrent seizures, affecting over 50 million people worldwide. The prompt and accurate detection of epileptic events is crucial for effective treatment and management. Traditional methods such as Electroencephalogram (EEG) have been complemented by Magnetoencephalography (MEG), which offers superior spatial resolution due to its insensitivity to the distortive effects of the skull and scalp. This study advances the analysis of MEG data using Complex Continuous Morlet Wavelet Transform (CCMWT) for feature extraction, coupled with innovative machine learning architectures for classifying epileptic versus non-epileptic signal segments. We developed and compared a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (3D-CNN) and a VGG16 model with the Transfer learning strategy, in terms of accuracy, computational efficiency, and error rates. Our results demonstrate the VGG16 model with the Transfer learning strategy's superior performance in all cases except the computation times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→