MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400527407 · doi:10.17953/a3.1916

Land, Labor, and Relationality: A Critical Engagement of Marx and Indigenous Studies

2024· article· en· W4400527407 on OpenAlexaff
Kelsey Lindquist

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Indian Culture and Research Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousSociologySocial scienceHistoryAnthropologyEthnologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the author places Marxist scholarship in conversation with critical Indigenous theory, outlining Marx's insights and tracing recent development within Marxist-feminist literature before critiquing this scholarship from the perspective of critical Indigenous theory. The author argues that the failure to attend to Indigenous sovereignties is a critical limitation undermining attempts to theorize multiple systems of oppression, demonstrating that critical Indigenous theory, with its more expansive understanding of relationality, not only addresses this limitation but also extends the theorization beyond the logic of capital.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Indian Culture and Research JournalSame topicAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207