Subject-Based Domain Adaptation for Facial Expression Recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adapting a deep learning model to a specific target individual is a challenging facial expression recognition (FER) task that may be achieved using unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) methods. Although several UDA methods have been proposed to adapt deep FER models across source and target data sets, multiple subject-specific source domains are needed to accurately represent the intra-and inter-person variability in subject-based adaption. This paper considers the setting where domains correspond to individuals, not entire datasets. Unlike UDA, multi-source domain adaptation (MSDA) methods can leverage multiple source datasets to improve the accuracy and robustness of the target model. However, previous methods for MSDA adapt image classification models across datasets and do not scale well to a more significant number of source domains. This paper introduces a new MSDA method for subject-based domain adaptation in FER. It efficiently leverages information from multiple source subjects (labeled source domain data) to adapt a deep FER model to a single target individual (unlabeled target domain data). During adaptation, our subject-based MSDA first computes a between-source discrepancy loss to mitigate the domain shift among data from several source subjects. Then, a new strategy is employed to generate augmented confident pseudo-labels for the target subject, allowing a reduction in the domain shift between source and target subjects. Experiments1performed on the challenging BioVid heat and pain dataset with 87 subjects and the UNBC-McMaster shoulder pain dataset with 25 subjects show that our subject-based MSDA can outperform state-of-the-art methods yet scale well to multiple subject-based source domains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".