Mass balance and economic study of a treatment chain for rare earths, base metals and precious metals recovery from used smartphones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, a comprehensive hydrometallurgical process was developed for the recovery of several types of metals from used cell phone printed circuit board assemblies. The overall process is divided into four stages of selective leaching of rare earth elements (REE), copper, nickel, silver and finally gold. After solubilization, the metals were purified using precipitation, solvent extraction, electrodeposition, and cementation techniques. Laboratory pilot-scale tests of the complete smart phone printed circuit board processing line showed REE, copper, nickel, silver, and gold recovery efficiencies of 78.0 %, 98.8 %, 81.8 %, 100 % and 96.1 %, respectively. The purity of the products obtained is evaluated at 94.8 % for rare earth oxides (70.0 % Nd2O3, 18.5 % Pr2O3, 2.8 % Dy2O3 and 2.4 % Sm2O3), 99.8 % for elemental copper, 94.3 % for nickel oxide, 93.8 % for silver and 89.3 % for gold. A scenario involving the installation of a plant processing 1 t/h of waste was evaluated using SuperPro Designer software. For a total investment of $53.22 million and an operating cost of $18.23 million per year, the main revenue is $65.77 million per year, with a return on investment of 91.6 % and a payback period of 1.1 years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".