MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400535201 · doi:10.32857/bap.2023.405.01

Stratigraphy and facies of the middle and upper Hamilton Group (Middle Devonian; Givetian) in New York State and adjacent areas

2023· article· en· W4400535201 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carlton E. Brett, Gordon C. Baird, James Zambito, Alexander Bartholomew

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletins of American Paleontology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleontologyGeologyDevonianFaciesGroup (periodic table)TrilobiteSiltstoneConodontStratigraphyClastic rockBiostratigraphySedimentary rockOrdovicianStructural basinTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Middle Devonian (lower–middle Givetian) Hamilton Group of New York State is an iconic unit in North America, which has contributed many key concepts in stratigraphy, sedimentary geology, paleoecology, and evolution. This interval comprises a 100- to 1200-m-thick clastic wedge, shed westward from the Acadian Mountains, with thin but persistent carbonates. Despite the rich and diverse invertebrate fauna that consists of more than 300 species of corals, bryozoans, brachiopods, mollusks, echinoderms, and trilobites, the age of the Hamilton Group is rather poorly constrained in terms of chronostratigraphy owing to the rarity of biostratigraphically useful conodonts and goniatites. The upper part of the Hamilton Group that is the focus of this paper apparently belongs to the Polygnathus timorensis to middle Polygnathus ansatus Conodont chronozones. The middle to upper Hamilton Group in New York State comprises three formations—the Skaneateles, Ludlowville, and Moscow—each defined as an interval delimited with a sharply based fossiliferous limestone-calcareous siltstone; these formations are interpreted as containing condensed transgressive deposits overlain by thicker highstand to falling-stage shales, mudstones/siltstones, and sandstones. The eastern equivalents of these formations are dominated by fine-grained sandstones and siltstones and include two formations: the Panther Mountain Formation, equivalent to the Skaneateles and Ludlowville formations combined, and the Cooperstown Formation, equivalent to the Moscow Formation. In the present paper, we review, revise and update a hierarchical framework of lithostratigraphic subdivisions of these formations, including 24 members (four new), 50 submembers (more than half newly proposed or redefined; 14 informal at this time), and more than 80 named beds, both formal and informal. This refined lithostratigraphy provides an excellent framework for studying high-resolution sequence stratigraphy. As defined herein, members and most submembers represent high-frequency depositional sequences with basal shell-rich carbonates and abrupt flooding surfaces that mark the bases of highstand deposits. Not only are most of the members and submembers traceable across western and central New York, but also to a lesser extent into adjacent regions that include southern Ontario, Ohio, the Michigan Basin, and northeastern Pennsylvania. Nevertheless, much work on correlation remains to be done in eastern New York and central Pennsylvania, where local progradation of siliciclastics and expansion of successions obscures many of the finer scale features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletins of American PaleontologySame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207