MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The fifth international hackathon for developing computational cloud-based tools and resources for pan-structural variation and genomics

2024· preprint· en· W4400537635 on OpenAlexaff
Sontosh K Deb, Divya Kalra, Jędrzej Kubica, Erik Stricker, Van Q. Truong, Qiandong Zeng, Christopher J. Fiscus, Daniel Paiva Agustinho, Adam C. Alexander, Marlon Arciniega-Sanchez, Lorianne Bosseau, Christian Brueffer, Astrid Canal, Joyjit Daw, David Enoma, Alison Diaz-Cuevas, Colin Diesh, Janet Doolittle‐Hall, Luis Fernandez-Luna, Tina Han, Wolfram Höps, Peiming Peter Huang, Tony T. Huang, Michal Izydorczyk, Farhang Jaryani, Rupesh K. Kesharwani, Shaheerah Khan, Sina Majidian, Ayan Malakar, Tânia Girão Mangolini, Sejal Modha, Mauricio Moldes, Rajarshi Mondal, Abdullah Al Nahid, Chi-Lam Poon, Sagayamary Sagayaradj, Philippe Sanio, Tania Sepulveda-Morales, Muhammad Shahzaib, Muhammad Sohail Raza, Trinh Tat, Ishaan Thota, Ümran Yaman, Jason Yeung, Qiyi Yu, Xinchang Zheng, Medhat Mahmoud, Fritz J. Sedlazeck, Ben Busby

Bibliographic record

VenueF1000Research · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowComputer scienceCloud computingPython (programming language)SoftwareData scienceMetagenomicsScripting languageWorld Wide WebModular designSoftware engineeringDatabaseBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The goal of the Fifth Annual Baylor College of Medicine & DNAnexus Structural Variation Hackathon was to push forward the research on structural variants (SVs) by rapidly developing and deploying open-source software. The event took place in-person and virtually in August 2023, when 49 scientists from 14 countries and 8 U.S. states collaboratively worked on projects to address critical gaps in the field of genomics. The hackathon projects concentrated on developing bioinformatic workflows for the following challenges: RNA transcriptome comparison, simulation of mosaic variations, metagenomics, Mendelian variation, SVs in plant genomics, and assembly vs. mapping SV calling comparisons. Methods As a starting point we used publicly available data from state-of-the-art long- and short-read sequencing technologies. The workflows developed during the hackathon incorporated open-source software, as well as scripts written using Bash and Python. Moreover, we leveraged the advantages of Docker and Snakemake for workflow automation. Results The results of the hackathon consists of six prototype bioinformatic workflows that use open-source software for SV research. We made the workflows scalable and modular for usability and reproducibility. Furthermore, we tested the workflows on example public data to show that the workflows can work. The code and the data produced during the event have been made publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/collaborativebioinformatics) to reproduce and built upon in the future. Conclusions The following sections describe the motivation, lessons learned, and software produced by teams during the hackathon. Here, we describe in detail the objectives, value propositions, implementation, and use cases for our workflows. In summary, the article reports the advancements in the development of software for SV detection made during the hackathon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0060.016
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2490.113

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueF1000ResearchSame topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207