MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400550771 · doi:10.29303/jstl.v10i2.564

Evaluasi Penyerapan Kadar Logam Pada Daun Tanaman Wetland Pasca Pengolahan Limbah Cair Tenun

2024· article· en· W4400550771 on OpenAlexaff
M. Gegas Imamuna Al Hidayat, Joni Aldilla Fajri, Dewi Wulandari

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Sains Teknologi & Lingkungan · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadmiumAtomic absorption spectroscopyChemistryDry weightNitric acidChromiumMetalCopperEnvironmental chemistryNuclear chemistryHorticultureInorganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water pollution can be caused by an increase in the number of industries, one of which is the textile industry. One effort to reduce water pollution by heavy metals is by utilizing absorption by plants. This research aims to determine the concentration of metal pollutants Cr, Cu, Cd, and Pb accumulated by Vetiveria zizanioides plants. The test method in this research was wet digestion using a nitric acid solution (HNO3) which was then analyzed using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). Based on research results, the average metal absorption concentration of copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), Lead (Pb), and cadmium (Cd) after processing using the FTW system with the help of bacteria in processing the highest metal content is Pb 0.0007 (mg /Kg dry weight) and for Cu it is 0.0001 (mg/Kg dry weight) and Cd metal is 0.00002 (mg/Kg dry weight) and finally Cr is 0.000001 (mg/Kg dry weight). And for processing using the FTW system without the help of bacteria in processing, the average metal absorption concentration of Cu, Cr, Pb, and Cd, the highest metal content at Cu 0.0001 (mg/Kg dry weight) and Pb 0.0003 (mg/ Kg dry weight) for Cr and Cd were not detected. The absorption of Cu, Cr, Pb, and Cd metals did not affect plant growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Sains Teknologi & LingkunganSame topicHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationFrench-language works237,207