Optimizing hybrid ensemble feature selection strategies for transcriptomic biomarker discovery in complex diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomedical research takes advantage of omic data, such as transcriptomics, to unravel the complexity of diseases. A conventional strategy identifies transcriptomic biomarkers characterized by expression patterns associated with a phenotype by relying on feature selection approaches. Hybrid ensemble feature selection (HEFS) has become increasingly popular as it ensures robustness of the selected features by performing data and functional perturbations. However, it remains difficult to make the best suited choices at each step when designing such approaches. We conducted an extensive analysis of four possible HEFS scenarios for the identification of Stage IV colorectal, Stage I kidney and lung and Stage III endometrial cancer biomarkers from transcriptomic data. These scenarios investigate the use of two types of feature reduction by filters (differentially expressed genes and variance) conjointly with two types of resampling strategies (repeated holdout by distribution-balanced stratified and random stratified) for downstream feature selection through an aggregation of thousands of wrapped machine learning models. Based on our results, we emphasize the advantages of using HEFS approaches to identify complex disease biomarkers, given their ability to produce generalizable and stable results to both data and functional perturbations. Finally, we highlight critical issues that need to be considered in the design of such strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".