MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4400565890 · doi:10.26879/1280

New remains of Liopleurodon (Reptilia, Plesiosauria) from the Middle Jurassic of western France and paedomorphosis within pliosaurids

2024· article· en· W4400565890 on OpenAlexaff
Peggy Vincent, Didier Poncet, Anthony Rard, Jean-Pierre Robin, Rémi Allemand

Bibliographic record

VenuePalaeontologia Electronica · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeotenyPaleontologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new specimen of the pliosaurid Liopleurodon ferox from the Callovian strata (Middle Jurassic) of France is described. This new specimen represents one of the most-complete post-cranial skeletons known for this species. Remains of Liopleurodon ferox were previously reported from central and southern England, Germany, the North of France, and possibly from Poland and Russia. The specimen examined here therefore extends the biogeographical area of the species into central France and represents the southernmost occurrence of this taxon. Based on osteological evidence, the specimen is here identified as an “adult” individual, confirming that the lack of fusion between the cervical neural arches and associated centra is not a reliable indicator of a juvenile condition in pliosaurids. Instead, such a lack of fusion in cervical vertebrae is more likely to be paedomorphic in adult pliosaurids, as noted in previous works. However, this statement does not hold true for dorsal and caudal vertebrae, or cervical ribs, in which the pattern of suture closure may vary according to taxa. Overall, our results indicate that the open or closed conditions of the neurocentral sutures of all the vertebrae of the vertebral column, as well as the suture between ribs and centra, is a poor indicator of ontogenetic stages in pliosaurids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalaeontologia Electronica→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→