MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400567693 · doi:10.1101/2024.07.10.24310212

Personalised risk prediction tools for cryptococcal meningitis mortality to guide treatment stratification; a pooled analysis of two randomised-controlled trials

2024· preprint· en· W4400567693 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas H. A. Samuels, Síle F. Molloy, David S. Lawrence, Angela Loyse, Cecilia Kanyama, Robert S. Heyderman, Win Shun Lai, Sayoki Mfinanga, Sokoine Lesikari, Duncan Chanda, Charles Kouanfack, Elvis Temfack, Olivier Lortholary, Mina C. Hosseinipour, Adrienne K. Chan, David B. Meya, David R. Boulware, Henry C. Mwandumba, Graeme Meintjes, Conrad Muzoora, M. Mosepele, Chiratidzo E. Ndhlovu, Nabila Youssouf, Thomas S. Harrison, Joseph N Jarvis, Rishi K Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersMedical Research CouncilUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsCryptococcal meningitisRisk stratificationMedicinePooled analysisStratification (seeds)Meta-analysisInternal medicineIntensive care medicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Family medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background Cryptococcal meningitis is a leading cause of adult community-acquired meningitis in sub-Saharan Africa with high mortality rates in the first 10 weeks post diagnosis. Practical tools to stratify mortality risk may help to tailor effective treatment strategies. Methods We pooled individual-level data from two randomised-controlled trials of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis across eight sub-Saharan African countries (ACTA, ISRCTN45035509 ; Ambition-cm, ISRCTN72509687 ). We used this pooled dataset to develop and validate multivariable logistic regression models for 2-week and 10-week mortality. Candidate predictor variables were specified a priori . ‘Basic’ models were developed using only predictors available in resource-limited settings; ‘Research’ models were developed from all available predictors. We used internal-external cross-validation to evaluate performance across countries within the development cohort, before validation of discrimination, calibration and net benefit in held-out data from Malawi (Ambition-cm trial). We also evaluated whether treatment effects in the trials were heterogenous by predicted mortality risk. Findings We included 1488 participants, of whom 236 (15.9%) and 469 (31.5%) met the 2-week and 10-week mortality outcomes, respectively. In the development cohort (n=1263), five variables were selected into the basic model (haemoglobin, neutrophil count, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Glasgow coma scale and treatment regimen), with two additional variables in the research model (cerebrospinal fluid quantitative culture and opening pressure) for 2-week mortality. During internal-external cross-validation, both models showed consistent discrimination across countries (pooled areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.82) and 0.78 (0.75-0.82) for the ‘Basic’ and ‘Research’ 2-week mortality models, respectively), with some variation in calibration between sites. Performance was similar in held-out validation (n=225), with the models demonstrating higher net benefit to inform decision-making than alternative approaches including a pre-existing comparator model. In exploratory analyses, treatment effects varied by predicted mortality risk, with a trend towards lower absolute and relative mortality for a single high-dose liposomal Amphotericin B-based regimen (in comparison to 1-week Amphotericin B deoxycholate plus flucytosine) among lower risk participants in the Ambition-cm trial. Interpretation Both models accurately predict mortality, were generalisable across African trial settings, and have potential to be incorporated into future treatment stratification approaches in low and middle-income settings. Funding MRC, United Kingdom (100504); ANRS, France (ANRS12275); SIDA, Sweden (TRIA2015-1092); Wellcome/MRC/UKAID Joint Global Health Trials (MR/P006922/1); European DCCT Partnership; NIHR, United Kingdom through a Global Health Research Professorship to JNJ (RP-2017-08-ST2-012) and a personal Fellowship to RKG (NIHR302829). RESEARCH IN CONTEXT Evidence before this study There is an urgent need to improve clinical management for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in resource limited settings across Africa. Cryptococcal meningitis accounts for ∼112,000 AIDS-related deaths per year globally, with over 75% in Africa, despite widespread antiretroviral therapy roll-out. The development of practical tools to identify patients at highest risk of death could help to tailor management strategies and stratify therapy. We searched PubMed for studies published between database inception and Jan 12, 2024, using the terms “cryptococcal meningitis”, “HIV”, “human immunodeficiency virus”, “immunocompromised”, “predict*”, and “model*”, with no language restrictions. Three previous studies, all conducted in China, have developed prognostic models for cryptococcal meningitis mortality. Of these, two used statistical methods while the third used machine learning but focused on persons without HIV only. No studies conducted in Africa, specifically targeting people living with HIV, or using both statistical and machine learning approaches in parallel, were identified. Well-developed and validated tools to predict risk of cryptococcal meningitis mortality and guide treatment stratification are thus lacking for resource limited settings in Africa. Added value of this study To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date to develop and validate prediction models for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis mortality. We combined high-quality data from the two largest randomised-controlled clinical trials conducted to date for cryptococcal meningitis treatment, with a total sample size of 1488 participants of whom 236 (15.9%) and 469 (31.5%) met the 2-week and 10-week mortality outcomes, respectively. We developed two models, ‘basic’ and ‘research’, to enable use in both resource-limited and research settings (where additional prognostic markers such as measurements of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure and CSF fungal burden may also be available). In the 2-week mortality models, five variables were included in the ‘basic’ model, with two additional variables included in the ‘research’ model. Both models predicted risk of mortality with consistent discrimination and calibration across sub-Saharan African settings. Head-to-head statistical (logistic regression) and machine learning (XGBoost) methods revealed no added value of the machine learning approach. In exploratory analyses, treatment effects varied by predicted 2-week mortality risk, thus providing proof-of-concept for future treatment stratification approaches. Specifically, there was a trend towards lower mortality for a single high-dose liposomal Amphotericin B-based regimen (in comparison to 1-week Amphotericin B deoxycholate plus flucytosine) among lower risk participants in the Ambition-cm trial. Implications of all the available evidence The personalised risk predictor for cryptococcal meningitis (PERISKOPE-CM) models accurately predicted mortality risk among patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis and demonstrated generalisable performance across trial settings in Africa. Predictions from the models could be utilised to direct treatment stratification approaches in future clinical trials, with patients at lowest predicted risk receiving less intensive and less toxic therapy. The models have been made available for future research use on an open access online interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.111
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.167
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1110.167
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.040
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207