MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400569075 · doi:10.31720/jga.8.2.3

Ethnic Foods and Immigrant Entrepreneurship: The Production and Marketing of Korean Foods in Toronto, Canada

2024· article· en· W4400569075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jin Suk Bae

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global and Area Studies(JGA) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationEthnic groupEntrepreneurshipProduction (economics)MarketingBusinessPolitical scienceSociologyAnthropologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study uses an oral life history perspective to examine Mr. Jasun (Jason) Koo’s entrepreneurial activities in Canada’s ethnic food manufacturing industry. He is a Korean immigrant entrepreneur who co-founded and runs the Toronto-based PH Food Company, which has produced tofu, dumplings, rice cakes, and noodles since 1976. Previous studies demonstrated that Korean restaurants and grocery businesses have been closely associated with forming and developing Korean communities in North America. However, studies on local production and marketing of Korean food items in Canadian society are rare. The main research findings are as follows: Mr. Koo has utilized various ethnic and transnational resources to start and operate a Korean food manufacturing business. Furthermore, he has grown and diversified the company’s customer base, from Korean to multiethnic consumers over the years, thanks to awareness of tofu as a health food product, commonality among Asian food culture, growing popularity of Korean culture and food among Canadian consumers, and his son joining the business. This study is expected to contribute to elucidating the history of Korean immigration to Canada, Korean entrepreneurs’ involvement in Canada’s food industry, and the spread and significance of Korean food culture overseas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Global and Area Studies(JGA)Same topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207