Morphological classification of neurons based on Sugeno fuzzy integration and multi-classifier fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to extract more important morphological features of neuron images and achieve accurate classification of the neuron type, a method is proposed that uses Sugeno fuzzy integral integration of three optimized deep learning models, namely AlexNet, VGG11_bn, and ResNet-50. Firstly, using the pre-trained model of AlexNet and the output layer is fine-tuned to improve the model's performance. Secondly, in the VGG11_bn network, Global Average Pooling (GAP) is adopted to replace the traditional fully connected layer to reduce the number of parameters. Additionally, the generalization ability of the model is improved by transfer learning. Thirdly, the SE(squeeze and excitation) module is added to the ResNet-50 variant ResNeXt-50 to adjust the channel weight and capture the key information of the input data. The GELU activation function is used to better fit the data distribution. Finally, Sugeno fuzzy integral is used to fuse the output of each model to get the final classification result. The experimental results showed that on the Img_raw, Img_resample and Img_XYalign dataset, the accuracy of 4-category classification reached 98.04%, 91.75% and 93.13%, respectively, and the accuracy of 12-category classification reached 97.82%, 85.68% and 87.60%, respectively. The proposed method has good classification performance in the morphological classification of neurons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".