MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400571355 · doi:10.1111/mice.13304

Multiresolution dynamic mode decomposition approach for wind pressure analysis and reconstruction around buildings

2024· article· en· W4400571355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceDynamic mode decompositionDecompositionWind powerMode (computer interface)Field (mathematics)Data miningReal-time computingEngineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate wind pressure analysis on high-rise buildings is critical for wind load prediction. However, traditional methods struggle with the inherent complexity and multiscale nature of these data. Furthermore, the high cost and practical limitations of deploying extensive sensor networks restrict the data collection capabilities. This study addresses these limitations by introducing a novel framework for optimal sensor placement on high-rise buildings. The framework leverages the strengths of multiresolution dynamic mode decomposition (mrDMD) for feature extraction and incorporates a novel regularization term within an existing sensor placement algorithm under constraints. This innovative term enables the algorithm to consider real-world system constraints during sensor selection, leading to a more practical and efficient solution for wind pressure analysis. mrDMD effectively analyzes the multiscale features of wind pressure data. The extracted mrDMD modes, combined with the enhanced constrained QR decomposition technique, guide the selection of informative sensor locations. This approach minimizes the required number of sensors while ensuring accurate pressure field reconstruction and adhering to real-world placement constraints. The effectiveness of this method is validated using data from a scaled building model tested in a wind tunnel. This approach has the potential to revolutionize wind pressure analysis for high-rise buildings, paving the way for advancements in digital twins, real-time monitoring, and risk assessment of wind loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it