MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Untapping the potential of mobile location data: The opportunities and challenges for retail analytics

2024· article· en· W4400574313 on OpenAlex
Joseph Aversa, Ali Azmy, Tony Hernandez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)AnalyticsData scienceBig dataRaw dataComputer scienceData analysisLocation dataBusinessData miningInternet privacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smartphone technology has created a burgeoning mobile location data (MLD) marketplace. MLD has been adopted by many retailers to track consumer behaviours at a granular level across space and time. This paper provides a critical empirical case study approach to generate spatiotemporal MLD-based insights using raw smartphone data at five super-regional shopping centres. The analysis and visualization of MLD-based metrics provide the basis to rethink how we approach retail analytics and location decision-making. Many challenges need to be addressed to leverage the full potential of MLD, including data bias, spatial and temporal accuracy and significant consumer privacy concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.908
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it