MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analyzing false turn-on events with varying gate drive parameters in high voltage GaN devices

2024· article· en· W4400576843 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicroelectronics Reliability · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeBallard Power Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurn (biochemistry)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsVoltageElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we address the problem of false turn-on effects in a half-bridge GaN power converter in terms of circuit and device parameters. The model shows that the inherent false turn-on problem is caused by slew rates d v ds dt and d v gs dt during the switching transients occurring at the turn-on and off phases. A higher slew rate propagates the gate driver voltage to overshoot beyond the threshold voltage causing it to accidentally turn on This study shows that d v ds dt is dependent on the internal device parameters such as g fs (transconductance) and C oss ( output capacitance). From the CV characteristics, it is pretty much evident that the internal capacitances C oss and C rss (reverse transfer capacitance) are reduced with higher drain voltage enabling higher slew rates which increases the probability of false turn-on problems. Experimental results at numerous operating points at 400 V with the variation in different gate drive parameters support the analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it