MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400577277 · doi:10.3390/biom14070839

Reversible Histone Modifications Contribute to the Frozen and Thawed Recovery States of Wood Frog Brains

2024· article· en· W4400577277 on OpenAlexafffund
Tighe Bloskie, Olawale O. Taiwo, Kenneth B. Storey

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomolecules · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHistoneChemistryBiologyAnatomyBiophysicsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epigenetic regulation, notably histone post-translational modification (PTM), has emerged as a major transcriptional control of gene expression during cellular stress adaptation. In the present study, we use an acid extraction method to isolate total histone protein and investigate dynamic changes in 23 well-characterized histone methylations/acetylations in the brains of wood frogs subject to 24-h freezing and subsequent 8-h thawed recovery conditions. Our results identify four histone PTMs (H2BK5ac, H3K14ac, H3K4me3, H3K9me2) and three histone proteins (H1.0, H2B, H4) that were significantly (p < 0.05) responsive to freeze-thaw in freeze-tolerant R. sylvatica brains. Two other permissive modifications (H3R8me2a, H3K9ac) also trended downwards following freezing stress. Together, these data are strongly supportive of the proposed global transcriptional states of hypometabolic freeze tolerance and rebounded thawed recovery. Our findings shed light on the intricate interplay between epigenetic regulation, gene transcription and energy metabolism in wood frogs’ adaptive response to freezing stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomoleculesSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207