Similar Viral and Immune Characteristics of Kaposi Sarcoma in ART-treated People Living With HIV and Older Patients With Classic Kaposi Sarcoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Reemergence of human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8)-induced Kaposi sarcoma (KS) in people living with HIV (PLWH) despite antiretroviral therapy (ART) poses a clinical challenge because they already have favorable CD4 T-cell numbers and undetectable viral loads. We observed that clinical presentation in PLWH on ART resembled classic KS found in older HIV-uninfected patients and hypothesized that immunosenescence may thus play a role in occurrence of KS on ART. We compared viral and immune factors implicated in the development of KS in ART-treated PLWH (HIV KS) and HIV-uninfected classic KS patients (cKS), compared to controls without KS (HIV Control, cControls respectively). Methods: Plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cell, and skin tissues were obtained from 11 HIV KS and 11 cKS patients and 2 groups of age-matched controls. Results: HIV KS participants were younger than cKS (aged 53 vs 75 years). HHV-8 genotypes did not differ between groups. Despite the younger age and a lower CD4/CD8 ratio, activated, exhausted, and senescent T-cell frequencies were similar between HIV KS and cKS. Anti-HHV-8 immunoglobulin G levels were higher and circulating HHV-8 DNA lower in HIV KS compared with cKS. Circulating platelet-derived growth factors AA-BB and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were higher in HIV KS We observed similar levels of HHV-8 DNA and PD-1 expression in skin lesions from HIV KS and cKS patients. Conclusions: Altogether, early immune senescence could be involved in the development of KS in ART-treated PLWH. Higher anti-HHV-8 immunoglobulin G levels could be linked with lower circulating viral load. Such insights should help developing therapeutical strategies to prevent development and treat KS in PLWH on ART.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".