MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400579058 · doi:10.3390/drones8070321

Federated Reinforcement Learning for Collaborative Intelligence in UAV-Assisted C-V2X Communications

2024· article· en· W4400579058 on OpenAlex
Abhishek Gupta, Xavier Fernando

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrones · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)Convergence (economics)Reduction (mathematics)Real-time computingDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper applies federated reinforcement learning (FRL) in cellular vehicle-to-everything (C-V2X) communication to enable vehicles to learn communication parameters in collaboration with a parameter server that is embedded in an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Different sensors in vehicles capture different types of data, contributing to data heterogeneity. C-V2X communication networks impose additional communication overhead in order to converge to a global model when the sensor data are not independent-and-identically-distributed (non-i.i.d.). Consequently, the training time for local model updates also varies considerably. Using FRL, we accelerated this convergence by minimizing communication rounds, and we delayed it by exploring the correlation between the data captured by various vehicles in subsequent time steps. Additionally, as UAVs have limited battery power, processing of the collected information locally at the vehicles and then transmitting the model hyper-parameters to the UAVs can optimize the available power consumption pattern. The proposed FRL algorithm updates the global model through adaptive weighing of Q-values at each training round. By measuring the local gradients at the vehicle and the global gradient at the UAV, the contribution of the local models is determined. We quantify these Q-values using nonlinear mappings to reinforce positive rewards such that the contribution of local models is dynamically measured. Moreover, minimizing the number of communication rounds between the UAVs and vehicles is investigated as a viable approach for minimizing delay. A performance evaluation revealed that the FRL approach can yield up to a 40% reduction in the number of communication rounds between vehicles and UAVs when compared to gross data offloading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it