MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400581753 · doi:10.1145/3660823

Dependency-Induced Waste in Continuous Integration: An Empirical Study of Unused Dependencies in the npm Ecosystem

2024· article· en· W4400581753 on OpenAlexaff
Nimmi Rashinika Weeraddana, Mahmoud Alfadel, Shane McIntosh

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDependency (UML)Computer scienceContext (archaeology)ReuseJSONDependency theory (database theory)Code reuseResource (disambiguation)Dependency graphDatabaseSoftwareSoftware engineeringFunctional dependencyRelational databaseOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern software systems are increasingly dependent upon code from external packages (i.e., dependencies). Building upon external packages allows software reuse to span across projects seamlessly. Package maintainers regularly release updated versions to provide new features, fix defects, and address security vulnerabilities. Due to the potential for regression, managing dependencies is not just a trivial matter of selecting the latest versions. Since it is perceived to be less risky to retain a dependency than remove it, as projects evolve, they tend to accrue dependencies, exacerbating the difficulty of dependency management. It is not uncommon for a considerable proportion of external packages to be unused by the projects that list them as a dependency. Although such unused dependencies are not required to build and run the project, updates to their dependency specifications will still trigger Continuous Integration (CI) builds. The CI builds that are initiated by updates to unused dependencies are fundamentally wasteful. Considering that CI build time is a finite resource that is directly associated with project development and service operational costs, understanding the consequences of unused dependencies within this CI context is of practical importance. In this paper, we study the CI waste that is generated by updates to unused dependencies. We collect a dataset of 20,743 commits that are solely updating dependency specifications (i.e., the package.json file), spanning 1,487 projects that adopt npm for managing their dependencies. Our findings illustrate that 55.88% of the CI build time that is associated with dependency updates is only triggered by unused dependencies. At the project level, the median project spends 56.09% of its dependency-related CI build time on updates to unused dependencies. For projects that exceed the budget of free build minutes, we find that the median percentage of billable CI build time that is wasted due to unused-dependency commits is 85.50%. Moreover, we find that automated bots are the primary producers of dependency-induced CI waste, contributing 92.93% of the CI build time that is spent on unused dependencies. The popular Dependabot is responsible for updates to unused dependencies that account for 74.52% of that waste. To mitigate the impact of unused dependencies on CI resources, we introduce D ep-s CI mitar , an approach to cut down wasted CI time by identifying and skipping CI builds that are triggered due to unused-dependency commits. A retrospective evaluation of the 20,743 studied commits shows that D ep-s CI mitar reduces wasted CI build time by 68.34% by skipping wasteful builds with a precision of 94%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.089
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.089
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ACM on software engineering.Same topicSoftware Engineering ResearchFrench-language works237,207