MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400582819 · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.101026

Federated learning as a catalyst for digital healthcare innovations

2024· editorial· en· W4400582819 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePatterns · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsVector InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsTransformative learningHealth careSafeguardingData sharingKnowledge managementComputer scienceData sciencePolitical scienceSociologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the landscape of digital healthcare continues to evolve, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) presents both immense opportunities and profound challenges. At the heart of this dynamic field lies the quest for innovative solutions that enhance patient care while safeguarding sensitive medical data. In response to these imperatives, the emergence of federated learning (FL) represents a pivotal advancement, offering a pathway to harness the collective intelligence of distributed healthcare datasets while respecting privacy and security protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0170.050
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it