Energetic Information from Information-Theoretic Approach in Density Functional Theory as Quantitative Measures of Physicochemical Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Hohenberg–Kohn theorem of density functional theory (DFT) stipulates that energy is a universal functional of electron density in the ground state, so energy can be thought of having encoded essential information for the density. Based on this, we recently proposed to quantify energetic information within the framework of information-theoretic approach (ITA) of DFT ( J. Chem. Phys . 2022, 157, 101103). In this study, we systematically apply energetic information to a variety of chemical phenomena to validate the use of energetic information as quantitative measures of physicochemical properties. To that end, we employed six ITA quantities such as Shannon entropy and Fisher information for five energetic densities, yielding twenty-six viable energetic information quantities. Then, they are applied to correlate with physicochemical properties of molecular systems, including chemical bonding, conformational stability, intermolecular interactions, acidity, aromaticity, cooperativity, electrophilicity, nucleophilicity, and reactivity. Our results show that different quantities of energetic information often behave differently for different properties but a few of them, such as Shannon entropy of the total kinetic energy density and information gain of the Pauli energy density, stand out and strongly correlate with several properties across different categories of molecular systems. These results suggest that they can be employed as quantitative measures of physicochemical properties. This work not only enriches the body of our knowledge about the relationship between energy and information, but also provides scores of newly introduced explicit density functionals to quantify physicochemical properties, which can serve as robust features for building machine learning models in future studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".