Aquibaculum arenosum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Rhodovibrionaceae, isolated from sea sand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A Gram-negative, non-motile, and creamy-white coloured bacterium, designated CAU 1616T, was isolated from sea sand collected at Ayajin Beach, Goseong-gun, Republic of Korea. The bacterium was found to grow optimally at 37 °C, pH 8.0–8.5, and with 1–5 % (w/v) NaCl. Phylogenetic analyses based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences placed strain CAU 1616T within the order Rhodospirillales. The highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity was to Fodinicurvata fenggangensis YIM D812T (94.1 %), Fodinicurvata sediminis YIM D82T (93.7 %), Fodinicurvata halophila BA45ALT (93.6 %) and Algihabitans albus HHTR 118T (92.3 %). Comparing strain CAU 1616T with closely related species (Fodinicurvata fenggangensis YIM D812T and Fodinicurvata sediminis YIM D82T), the average nucleotide identity based on blast+ values were 69.7–69.8 %, the average amino acid identity values were 61.3–61.4 %, and the digital DNA–DNA hybridization values were 18.4–18.5 %. The assembled draft genome of strain CAU 1616T had 29 contigs with an N50 value of 385.8 kbp, a total length of 3 490 371 bp, and a DNA G+C content of 65.1 mol%. The predominant cellular fatty acids were C18 : 1 2−OH, C19 : 0 cyclo ω8c, and summed feature 8 (C18 : 1 ω6c and/or C18 : 1 ω7c). The major respiratory quinone was Q-10. Based on phenotypic, phylogenetic, and chemotaxonomic evidence, strain CAU 1616T represents a novel genus in the family Rhodovibrionaceae, for which the name Aquibaculum arenosum gen. nov., sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is CAU 1616T (=KCTC 82428T=MCCC 1K06089T).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".