MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400585202 · doi:10.1227/ons.0000000000001272

Development and Validation of a Novel Human-Fixed Cadaveric Model Reproducing Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulation for Simulation of Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

2024· article· en· W4400585202 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperative Neurosurgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadaveric spasmMedicineSkullCerebrospinal fluidCerebrospinal fluid leakSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic endonasal surgery is a well-established surgical approach to the skull base. Surgeons need a reusable long-lasting tool to acquire the skills needed for skull base reconstruction. The aim of this study was to elaborate and validate a human formalin-fixed cadaveric model that reproduces a realistic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation and that adequately renders a CSF leak. METHODS: An external ventricular drain that connects with a peristaltic pump is placed in the subarachnoid space, which allows a water circulation that reproduces CSF circulation. Intracranial pressure is measured in real time. Endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches are performed, to create different skull base openings and CSF leaks. Participants were tasked with reconstruction of the defects using a standardized multilayered approach, with the goal of obtaining a watertight closure under normal intracranial pressure ranges. Compiled data included time of reconstruction, years of experience of participants, and success/failure to achieve a watertight reconstruction. A Likert questionnaire was also used. RESULTS: The cadaveric model reproduced CSF circulation in 4 types of dural defects: sellar, suprasellar, transcribriform, and transclival. Intracranial pressures were similar to physiological conditions and were reproducible. Each model was tested multiple times, over several months. Success rates concurred with training levels (r = .8282 and P = .0017). A strong inverse correlation was also found between years of experience and time of reconstruction (r = .4977 and P < .0001). Participants agreed that the model was realistic (median Likert score of 4), and they strongly agreed that it allowed for the improvement of their surgical skills (median Likert score of 5). CONCLUSION: This novel human-fixed cadaveric model for CSF circulation is efficient and adequately reproduces surgical conditions for skull base approaches. The model is unique, easy to reproduce, and reusable. It can be used as a tool for teaching and for research purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it