Multicultural school. Students’ identity and value system
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents the phenomenon of multiculturalism and multicultural and intercultural education on the basis of publications by J. Nikitorowicz, J. A. Banks, M. A. Gibson and other authors, as well as own research on the system of values and identity identification of students of the Canadian School in Warsaw. The article attempts to diagnose the system of values and identity of students of the Canadian School and compares the results of the research with the results of other researchers. The research shows what students of the multicultural school identify with and which values are most important to them. Presenting the system of values of young students, the author drew attention to the fact that the respondents highly value health, freedom, social values such as goodness, honesty, respect, safety and love. Identity self-identifications refer to declarations related to gender, sense of identity of national, European, global, religious and traditional nature. The value system and self-identifications of the students of the Canadian School prove that young people in a multicultural school are open-minded, modern and feel first and foremost citizens of the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it