Changes in Gut Microbiota in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Based on 16s rRNA Gene Sequencing Technology: A Review and Meta-Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: This meta-analysis explores alterations in the gut microbiota of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing. Methods: Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, our comprehensive review spanned major databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid, targeting observational studies that implemented 16S rRNA gene sequencing on fecal specimens. The quality of these studies was meticulously evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: Our search yielded 26 relevant studies conducted between 2015-2022, encompassing 2885 participants. No significant differences were observed in alpha diversity indices (Shannon, Chao1, Operational Taxonomic Units (OTU), and Simpson) between MS patients and controls in general. Nonetheless, subgroup analyses according to disease activity using the Shannon index highlighted a significant decrease in microbial diversity during MS’s active phase. Similarly, an evaluation focusing on MS phenotype revealed diminished diversity in individuals with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Microbial composition analysis revealed no consistent increase in pro-inflammatory Bacteroidetes or decrease in anti-inflammatory Firmicutes within the MS cohort. Conclusion: The gut microbiome’s role in MS presents a complex panorama, where alterations in microbial composition might hold greater significance to disease mechanisms than diversity changes. The impact of clinical factors such as disease activity and phenotype are moderately significant, underscoring the need for further research to elucidate these relationships. Prospective research should employ longitudinal methodologies to elucidate the chronological interplay among gut microbiota, disease evolution, and therapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it