Field validation of NDVI to identify crop phenological signatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose and Methods Crop identification using remotely sensed imagery provides useful information to make management decisions about land use and crop health. This research used phonecams to acquire the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) of various crops for three crop seasons. NDVI time series from Sentinel (L121-L192) images was also acquired using Google Earth Engine (GEE) for the same period. The resolution of satellite data is low therefore gap filling and smoothening filters were applied to the time series data. The comparison of data from satellite images and phenocam provides useful insight into crop phenology. The results show that NDVI is generally underestimated when compared to phenocam data. The Savitzky-Golay (SG) and some other gap filling and smoothening methods are applied to NDVI time series based on satellite images. The smoothened NDVI curves are statistically compared with daily NDVI series based on phenocam images as a reference. Results The SG method has performed better than other methods like moving average. Furthermore, polynomial order has been found to be the most sensitive parameter in applying SG filter in GEE. Sentinel (L121-L192) image was used to identify wheat during the year 2022–2023 in Sargodha district where experimental fields were located. The Random Forest Machine Leaning algorithm was used in GEE as a classifier. Conclusion The classification accuracy has been found 97% using this algorithm which suggests its usefulness in applying to other areas with similar agro-climatic characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".