MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400596751 · doi:10.55016/ojs/cdm.v15i1.62708

Latin Squares and their Bruhat Order

2020· article· en· W4400596751 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rosário Fernandes, Henrique F. da Cruz, Domingos Salomão

Bibliographic record

VenueContributions to Discrete Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
KeywordsLatin squareMathematicsCombinatoricsClass (philosophy)Order (exchange)Relation (database)Cover (algebra)Computer scienceBiologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we investigate the Bruhat order on the class of Latin squares. We study its cover relation and minimal elements. We prove that the class of Latin squares of order $n$, with $n\not\in\{1,2,4\}$, has at least two minimal elements, and we present a process to construct some minimal Latin squares for this relation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContributions to Discrete MathematicsSame topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207