MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400608832 · doi:10.1016/s2666-5247(24)00101-0

Detection and characterisation of a sixth Candida auris clade in Singapore: a genomic and phenotypic study

2024· article· en· W4400608832 on OpenAlexafffund
Chayaporn Suphavilai, Karrie Kwan Ki Ko, Kar Mun Lim, Mei Gie Tan, Patipan Boonsimma, Joash Jun Keat Chu, Sui Sin Goh, Prevena Rajandran, Lai Chee Lee, Kwee Yuen Tan, Bushra Binte Shaik Ismail, May Kyawt Aung, Yong Yang, Jean Xiang Ying Sim, Indumathi Venkatachalam, Benjamin Pei Zhi Cherng, Bram Spruijtenburg, Kian Sing Chan, Lynette Lin Ean Oon, Ai Ling Tan, Yen Ee Tan, Limin Wijaya, Ban Hock Tan, Moi Lin Ling, Tse Hsien Koh, Jacques F. Meis, Clement K. M. Tsui, Niranjan Nagarajan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Microbe · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilDuke-NUS Medical SchoolMedical Research CouncilGenome Institute of SingaporeUniversity of British ColumbiaSingapore General Hospital
KeywordsCandida aurisCladeBiologyPhenotypeGeneticsGeneAntifungalMicrobiologyPhylogenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris poses a serious threat to global public health due to its worldwide distribution, multidrug resistance, high transmissibility, propensity to cause outbreaks, and high mortality. We aimed to characterise three unusual C auris isolates detected in Singapore, and to determine whether they constitute a novel clade distinct from all previously known C auris clades (I-V). METHODS: In this genotypic and phenotypic study, we characterised three C auris clinical isolates, which were cultured from epidemiologically unlinked inpatients at a large tertiary hospital in Singapore. The index isolate was detected in April, 2023. We performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and obtained hybrid assemblies of these C auris isolates. The complete genomes were compared with representative genomes of all known C auris clades. To provide a global context, 3651 international WGS data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database were included in a high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. Antifungal susceptibility testing was done and antifungal resistance genes, mating-type locus, and chromosomal rearrangements were characterised from the WGS data of the three investigated isolates. We further implemented Bayesian logistic regression models to classify isolates into known clades and simulate the automatic detection of isolates belonging to novel clades as their WGS data became available. FINDINGS: The three investigated isolates were separated by at least 37 000 SNPs (range 37 000-236 900) from all existing C auris clades. These isolates had opposite mating-type allele and different chromosomal rearrangements when compared with their closest clade IV relatives. The isolates were susceptible to all tested antifungals. Therefore, we propose that these isolates represent a new clade of C auris, clade VI. Furthermore, an independent WGS dataset from Bangladesh, accessed via the NCBI Sequence Read Archive, was found to belong to this new clade. As a proof-of-concept, our Bayesian logistic regression model was able to flag these outlier genomes as a potential new clade. INTERPRETATION: The discovery of a new C auris clade in Singapore and Bangladesh in the Indomalayan zone, showing a close relationship to clade IV members most commonly found in South America, highlights the unknown genetic diversity and origin of C auris, particularly in under-resourced regions. Active surveillance in clinical settings, along with effective sequencing strategies and downstream analysis, will be essential in the identification of novel strains, tracking of transmission, and containment of adverse clinical effects of C auris infections. FUNDING: Duke-NUS Academic Medical Center Nurturing Clinician Researcher Scheme, and the Genedant-GIS Innovation Program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations136
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet MicrobeSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207