Numerical and experimental investigation of resin flow, heat transfer and cure in a 3D compression resin transfer moulding process using fast curing resin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compression resin transfer moulding (CRTM) has been widely used to manufacture automotive parts with reduced production cycle times. With the development of fast curing thermosetting resins, the CRTM process is a viable option for the high production rates in the transportation industry. However, the dynamic resin curing behaviour poses a potential risk of manufacturing defects in the part. In order to reduce the risk during the development of the tool and the process parameters, this paper proposes a modelling framework for the CRTM process when using fast curing resin systems. The work specifically focused on the coupling between heat transfer, resin cure, resin flow and preform compaction using a commercial code, PAM-RTM. The tool captures accurately the preform filling, temperature and resin pressure evolution during the injection and compression phase. The application of the framework was demonstrated for a complex 3D demonstrator. The predicted preform filling had an accuracy of 73% for the flow front evolution compared to the experimental results. This work demonstrates the validity of the framework proposed when dealing with resin systems that are challenging to process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it