An SIR‐based Bayesian framework for COVID‐19 infection estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Estimating the COVID‐19 infection fatality rate, inferring the latent incidence and predicting the future epidemic evolution are critical to public health surveillance, but often challenging due to limited data availability or quality. Recently, a Bayesian framework combining time series deconvolution of deaths with a parametric Susceptible–Infectious–Recovered (SIR) model was proposed by Irons and Raftery, 2021. We assess the parameter identifiability of the model using the profile likelihood approach and simulations, when only the time series of deaths and seroprevalence survey data are available. The robustness of the model to the more complex but also more realistic Susceptible–Exposed–Infectious–Recovered (SEIR)‐based epidemics is evaluated through simulations; the influence of potential biases in the serosurveys on the inference is also investigated. We use a stationary first‐order autoregressive prior to account for the variability of transmission rate over time. The results suggest that the model is relatively robust to SEIR‐based epidemics, especially when the reproductive number is low, given sufficient information from serosurveys or priors. However, the lack of parameter identifiability under limited data availability cannot be neglected. We apply the model to infer the COVID‐19 infections in Ontario and Quebec, Canada during the Omicron era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".