A Survey of Umbilical Cord Clamping Practices and Attitudes of Canadian Maternity Care Providers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite mounting evidence of the health benefits of delayed cord clamping of term and preterm neonates, Canadian practice guidelines about the optimal timing of cord clamping have not been developed. At the time the study was conducted, the Society of Obstetricians & Gynecologists of Canada (SOGC) recommended early clamping as part of active management, while findings from several randomized controlled trials pointed at reported benefits of delayed cord clamping. It is unclear how Canadian maternity care providers were interpreting the evidence around umbilical cord clamping and what they do in clinical practice. A link to an online survey was distributed to members of the Canadian Association of Midwives (CAM) and the SOGC to assess maternity care providers’ umbilical cord clamping practices and attitudes. Respondents were asked to answer questions pertaining to the timing of cord clamping, reasons for cord clamping practices and perceived benefits and risks associated with delayed cord clamping (> 60 seconds) for 1) term and 2) preterm infants (< 37 weeks). A total of 353 respondents met eligibility criteria (i.e. they provided intrapartum care at the time of data collection). The majority of obstetricians (77.9%) reported clamping the cord of term infants immediately (< 30 seconds), compared to 60.0% of family physicians and 9.8% of midwives; 6.5% of obstetricians, 9.1% of family physicians and 65.7% of midwives reported delaying cord clamping by two minutes or more. Midwives were more likely than physicians to make a conscious decision about the timing of cord clamping. Care providers reported higher rates of immediate cord clamping with preterm infants, compared to term infants, with 85% of physicians and 39% of midwives clamping the cord of preterm neonates within 30 seconds. The most common reason for clamping the cord of a term neonate immediately was the infants’ need for resuscitation or other medical interventions (79%). Personal routine was the most frequently cited reason for clamping the cord of a preterm infant immediately (40%). Findings from this survey highlight interprofessional variations in cord clamping practices. Clear practice guidelines around the optimal timing of cord clamping should be developed that take into considerations the health benefits of delaying cord clamping of term and preterm infants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".