MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400638857 · doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbae098

loco-pipe: an automated pipeline for population genomics with low-coverage whole-genome sequencing

2024· article· en· W4400638857 on OpenAlexaff
Zehua T Zhou, Gregory L. Owens, Wesley A. Larson, Runyang Nicolas Lou, Peter H. Sudmant

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNorth Pacific Research Board
KeywordsPipeline (software)GenomicsComputer scienceStreamlines, streaklines, and pathlinesPopulationSet (abstract data type)Pipeline transportGenomeComputational biologyBiologyEngineeringGeneticsMedicineOperating systemGeneProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary: We developed loco-pipe, a Snakemake pipeline that seamlessly streamlines a set of essential population genomic analyses for low-coverage whole genome sequencing (lcWGS) data. loco-pipe is highly automated, easily customizable, massively parallelized, and thus is a valuable tool for both new and experienced users of lcWGS. Availability and implementation: loco-pipe is published under the GPLv3. It is freely available on GitHub (github.com/sudmantlab/loco-pipe) and archived on Zenodo (doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10425920).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.119

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformatics AdvancesSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207