Unleashing the Potential of Stage-Wise Decision-Making in Scheduling of Graph-Structured Tasks Over Mobile Vehicular Clouds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To process high volumes of data across a fleet of dynamic and distributed vehicles, it is crucial to implement resource provisioning techniques that can provide reliable, cost-effective, and timely computing services. This article explores computation-intensive task scheduling over mobile vehicular clouds (MVCs). We use undirected weighted graphs (UWGs) to model both the execution of tasks and communication patterns among vehicles in an MVC. We then study reliable and timely scheduling of UWG tasks through a novel mechanism, operating on two complementary decision-making stages: Plan A and Plan B. Plan A entails a proactive decision-making approach, leveraging historical statistical data for the preemptive creation of an optimal mapping$(\alpha)$between tasks and the MVC prior to practical task scheduling. In contrast, Plan B explores a real-time decision-making paradigm, functioning as a reliable contingency plan. It seeks a viable mapping$(\beta)$if$\alpha$encounters failures during task scheduling due to the unpredictable nature of the network. Furthermore, we provide an in-depth exploration of the procedural intricacies and key contributing factors that underpin the success of our mechanism. Additionally, we present a case study showcasing our superior performance on time efficiency and computation overhead. We further discuss a series of open directions for future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".