MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Principal Component Regression for Small-Sample Microwave-Microfluidic Chemometrics Without De-Embedding

2024· article· en· W4400649280 on OpenAlexaff
Marie Mertens, Matko Martinic, Tomislav Marković, Raphaël Trouillon, Ke Wu, Dominique Schreurs

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersKU LeuvenFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsChemometricsPrincipal component regressionPrincipal component analysisComponent (thermodynamics)Sample (material)MicrofluidicsRegressionEmbeddingComputer sciencePartial least squares regressionStatisticsMathematicsMaterials sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceChromatographyMachine learningChemistryPhysicsNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Broadband dielectric spectroscopy allows for label-free analysis of biological material. However, the data can be challenging to interpret. In this work, Principal Component Regression (PCR) is introduced for the concentration extraction of multiple constituents of a liquid using microwave-microfluidics. S-parameters are measured from 0.5 to 18 GHz on a microwave-microfluidic chip with intentionally introduced error, loaded with solutions having various concentrations of Sodium Chloride (NaCl) and glucose. The mean absolute percentage error for the predictions of the concentration of NaCl and glucose was 2%. It was found that PCR can be used for the prediction of multiple constituents of a liquid with a limited number of training samples, and without needing to de-embed the measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207