Municipal street‐sweeping area generation with route optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Street sweeping is used in urban municipalities worldwide but requires a great deal of planning for large‐scale implementation. Municipalities typically make use of the macro‐ and microapproach by using operational areas in which routes are assigned, but creating operational areas without an understanding of the expected workload, number of routes, and the travel distance to and from the depot may lead to increased statistics. In this paper, a combination of heuristic approaches is used to assign street‐sweeping areas on the macroscale and generate street‐sweeping routes on the microscale. For the area assignment, a two‐stage cluster approach is proposed, making use of the weighted k ‐means algorithm and differential evolution. For the route optimization, a three‐phase augment merge algorithm is used to create initial solutions, the u‐turns are minimized with a modified version of Hierholzer's algorithm and tabu search, and the remaining u‐turns are removed using a forward‐searching ant colony optimization. A case study in The City of Oshawa, Canada, was used to verify the proposed methodology, and all metrics were theoretically improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".