The influence of social media content marketing on consumer engagement: A mediating of the role of consumer cognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research investigates how social media content marketing impacts customer engagement and it gives more weight to consumer cognition as an intermediary means. According to the study, digital communication has transformed significantly in our modern era, from simple communicative and content-sharing platforms to social media networks evolved into major marketing platforms. Organizations now fundamentally bring about transformations in their interaction with consumers depending on how they choose to use these public forums. As well, this paper begins to provide a comprehensive review of the social media content marketing literature, with topics such as augmented reality, credibility of content, user-generated content, and customer perceptions. The paper has a survey sample of 350 managers from relevant organizations, selected to provide a broad representative range across fields and industries. This study, under the Technology Acceptance Model, aims to understand better, how consumers accept and employ social media content marketing. Research questions to be addressed in this forthcoming paper include an investigation into how consumer belief serves to mediate the relation between social media content marketing and customer engagement Additionally, it aims to investigate the extent to which consumer cognition intervenes in this link, and whether consumers' beliefs moderate results of an interaction with social media platform contents source (such as reading a blog or watching a video). With this theoretical framework and the related literature, the project aims to provide significant insights and make a more successful marketing practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".