Data-driven transformation: The influence of analytics on organizational behavior in IT service companies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main goal of this research is to study and investigate the impact of data management and analysis tools on improving organizational behavior within three IT service firms in Jordan. This research focuses on choosing three data management and analysis tools: Database analysis tool, data processing tool, and big data processing tool and how these tools could positively influence enhancing employee performance and organizational behavior. It accomplishes this within the distinct framework of three Jordanian IT service firms. The research supposed that combining big data analysis, integrated data processing, and database analysis is necessary to enhance organizational behavior and employee performance, as indicated by the findings. Furthermore, the research highlights the potential for IT service firms in Jordan to benefit from emerging database analysis technologies, promote the use of integrated data processing techniques, and leverage big data analysis for their own benefit. This can enhance corporate behavior and employee performance. Data was distributed and collected from three Jordanian IT service firms, and all collected data was analyzed using AMOS. The study's findings offer valuable recommendations for enhancing the operational efficiency of IT service firms in similar business environments, emphasizing the crucial importance of comprehending and purposefully employing database-related technologies for sustained prosperity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".