MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400653907 · doi:10.1080/00085006.2024.2367856

<i>Kairos</i> of resilience: Ukraine’s cultural response to Russia’s invasion

2024· article· en· W4400653907 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Alexandre Zaezjev

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Slavonic Papers · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKairosResilience (materials science)Political scienceSociologyPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, which blends aspects of scholarly inquiry, opinion writing, travel reporting, and exhibition critique, the author explores the new temporal condition of Ukrainian culture in a state of emergency during the Russo-Ukrainian war. Specifically, he focuses on the noticeable shift from a permanent to a transient mode of existence of artistic activities, which piqued his interest during his visit to Kyiv in summer 2023. He examines the experience of time amidst the war, its weaponization, and its role in the establishment of hegemony – subsuming the victim within the temporal regime of the aggressor. First, guided by Nikolai Bakhtin’s theoretical framework, he characterizes Russia’s temporal regime as emblematic of the epic time of the Absolute Past and proposes the dynamics of kairos as an effective subversion of the aggressor’s temporal modality. He then uses this theoretical framework to analyze the following cultural artifacts that he experienced firsthand during his visit: an exhibition by contemporary Ukrainian artist Zhanna Kadyrova at the Pinchuk Art Centre; the Module of Temporality by Balbek Bureau; and the Babyn Yar Synagogue by Swiss architect Manuel Herz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Slavonic PapersSame topicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict ZonesFrench-language works237,207