Terahertz spectroscopy of collective charge density wave dynamics at the atomic scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Charge density waves are wave-like modulations of a material’s electron density that display collective amplitude and phase dynamics. The interaction with atomic impurities induces strong spatial heterogeneity of the charge-ordered phase. Direct real-space observation of phase excitation dynamics of such defect-induced charge modulation is absent. Here, by utilizing terahertz pump–probe spectroscopy in a scanning tunnelling microscope, we measure the ultrafast collective dynamics of the charge density wave in the transition metal dichalcogenide 2H-NbSe 2 with atomic spatial resolution. The tip-enhanced electric field of the terahertz pulses excites oscillations of the charge density wave that vary in magnitude and frequency on the scale of individual atomic impurities. Overlapping phase excitations originating from the randomly distributed atomic defects in the surface create this spatially structured response of the charge density wave. This ability to observe collective charge order dynamics with local probes makes it possible to study the dynamics of correlated materials at the intrinsic length scale of their underlying interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".