As trajetórias de Ribeiro do Valle e Rocha e Silva: farmacologia dentro e fora do laboratório (1933 - 1948)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
do Valle and Rocha e Silva graduated in Medicine, in So Paulo and Rio de Janeiro respectively.The study of these researchers enables the understanding of the historical path of pharmacology in So Paulo (and its entry into a national association), considering that both headed the first sections and laboratories dedicated to this specialty at the Instituto Butantan, the Escola Paulista de Medicina e the Instituto Biolgico.At the beginning, we entail an analysis of the training activities for these scientists in the 1930s.Next, we discuss the international partnerships of Ribeiro do Valle and Rocha e Silva, who worked in the United States during the 1940s as Guggenheim Foundation fellows.The latter also interned in Canada and the United Kingdom between 1946 and 1947.In addition, the two researchers formed consistent partnerships with Latin American scientists, mainly Argentinians associated to Bernardo Houssay, also analyzed in this work.The trajectories of Ribeiro do Valle and Rocha e Silva highlight the discontinuous arrangements and alliances that permeated the institutionalization of pharmacology, demonstrating how this area of research acquired legitimacy from the circulation -and transformation -of its objects and experiments, both inside and outside the laboratory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it