MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400681763 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2024.3429170

Federated Unfolding Learning for CSI Feedback in Distributed Edge Networks

2024· article· en· W4400681763 on OpenAlexaff
Chongyang Tan, Donghong Cai, Fang Fang, Zhiguo Ding, Pingzhi Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDistributed learningDistributed computingElectronic engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In distributed edge networks employing frequency division duplex, the feedback of channel state information (CSI) from the edge devices to the edge server always consumes a lot of spectrum resources, resulting in a serious communication burden. In this paper, we first propose an end-to-end unfolding neural network framework inspired by the soft threshold iterative algorithm (U-ISTANet). The proposed U-ISTANet integrates the advantages of compression awareness and neural networks. Especially, the compression matrix and sparse transformation of channel matrix can be learned for accurate CSI compression and recovery. And a lightweight version of U-ISTANet, called U-ISTANet-L, is proposed to reduce the training parameters. To reduce the data transmission overhead in the centralized learning framework, we extend the proposed U-ISTANet-L to a federated U-ISTANet-L (FU-ISTANet-L), which can train a more generalizable model by increasing the number of edge devices to enlarge the data set in a distributed learning manner. The proposed FU-ISTANet-L reduces the transmission overhead and increases the training speed while achieving a performance close to that of centralized learning. Furthermore, we propose a personalized FU-ISTANet-L (P-FU-ISTANet-L) to solve the heterogeneous data training problem in different communication environments. Specifically, we first obtain a pre-trained model by federation unfolding learning, and then each edge device fine-tunes the model using only a small amount of train data to obtain a personalized model for local channel environment. Extensive experimental results are provided to show that the proposed networks achieve a significant performance over the benchmarking schemes in terms of the normalized mean square error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207