MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4400684508 · doi:10.3917/i2d.241.0112

Entre Bibliosuisse et l’ADBS, un partenariat précieux

2024· article· fr· W4400684508 on OpenAlexaff
Amélie Valloton Preisig

Bibliographic record

VenueI2D - Information données & documents · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fondée en 2016, Bibliosuisse est l’association suisse des bibliothèques, centres de documentation et des professionnel·le·s I+D. Elle mène une politique active de partenariat nationale et international, via un processus stratégique participatif. Avec les associations francophones, et l’ADBS en particulier, dont elle est déjà partenaire, Bibliosuisse souhaite renforcer les collaborations. Les deux associations et leurs membres ont tout à gagner à ces rapprochements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.018
Science and technology studies0.0110.019
Scholarly communication0.0300.019
Open science0.0010.012
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueI2D - Information données & documentsSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207